The slump in the U.S. electric vehicle (EV) industry continued in 2025, and several startups, including Nikola (NKLAQ) and Canoo (GOEVQ), filed for bankruptcy, continuing the spate of bankruptcies from the previous year. Most U.S. EV startups that went public between 2020 and 2021 have already gone out of business or become inconsequential.
Rivian (RIVN) and Lucid Motors (LCID) are the only two EV startups of some consequence still standing, even as they trade at a fraction of their all-time highs. Both companies have tried to copy U.S. EV market leader Tesla’s (TSLA) playbook at various points, and Lucid’s former CEO, Peter Rawlinson, famously said in a 2021 interview that the EV industry would be a “two-horse race” between Tesla and Lucid.
Cut to 2025, and the EV landscape is much different and looks set to worsen further following the withdrawal of the EV tax credit. Amid the EV industry’s persistent woes, Morgan Stanley recently downgraded Tesla, Rivian, and Lucid Motors while upgrading General Motors (GM).
Meanwhile, while Lucid once pitched itself as the “next Tesla,” I find Rivian as an aspirant, too. Like Tesla, it too started with premium models and is now pivoting to affordable ones. Moreover, it is an integrated player like Tesla and has built its own sales network, bypassing dealers.
More recently, from giving its CEO, RC Scaringe, an Elon Musk-like compensation, albeit a much-stripped-down version of the $1 trillion that Tesla shareholders approved for Musk, to holding an Autonomy & AI Day, Rivian yet again seems to be borrowing a leaf or two from Tesla’s playbook. At the AI Day, among others, Rivian announced a new chip, robotaxi ambitions, and the new Autonomy+ driver-assistance package priced at $2,500. The pivot is not much different from Tesla, which offers its full self-driving for $8,000 and has commenced robotaxi operations. Meanwhile, even as both Rivian and Tesla are positioning themselves as AI plays, both are plagued by similar issues—sagging EV sales—and look set to report an annual decline in their 2025 deliveries.
While Rivian and Tesla’s strategies might sound similar, the comparison perhaps ends here. Firstly, their CEOs’ personalities are quite different, and Scaringe’s personality is in stark contrast to the flamboyant (and controversial) Musk. In terms of scale and size, Tesla is on a much higher pedestal and is a sustainable company, unlike Rivian, which, like fellow EV companies, needs frequent dosages of fresh capital to fund the burgeoning losses.